Prasanna

Here we are providing Evans Tries an O-level Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas, Extra Questions for Class 12 English was designed by subject expert teachers.

Evans Tries an O-level Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas

Evans Tries an O-level Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
When did the Governor rang up the Secretary of Examination Board and why?
Answer:
It was in early March when the Governor of Oxford , Prison rang up the Secretary of Examination Board that their one of the prisoners Evans wanted to take an O-Level examination in German.

Question 2.
What was Evans known as by the prison officers? What did the Governor decide?
Answer:
The prison officers used to call Evans – Evans the Break. Thrice he had escaped from the prison already. But this time the Governor decided that he would see everything personally.

Question 3.
Who were Jackson and Stephens?
Answer:
Jackson was the senior prison officer on D wing. Stephens was also an officer at the Oxford Prison. He was recently recruited to the profession. How-ever, they both proved good for nothing and used to jump into conclusion very soon without doing any investigation.

Question 4.
What were the contents of the small suitcase that McLeery carried?
Answer:
The suitcase that McLeery carried had a yellow invigilation paper, a sealed envelope containing the question paper, a copy of the Bible, the newspaper ‘The Church Times’, a paper knife and a small inflated rubber ring. McLerry said that he was suffering from piles and he needed it if he had to sit for some length of time.

Question 5.
Do you think Evans was really keen to get some sort of academic qualification?
Answer:
No, Evans was not at all keen to get any academic qualification. He pretended to take an O-level examination to escape from the prison. The German teacher, the invigilator, someone at the Examination Board and a fake prison officer were all part of his plan.

Question 6.
When did the Assistant Secretary, Examination Board ring up the Governor and why?
Answer:
At 9.40 a.m. the Assistant Secretary of the Examination Board rang up the Governor to say that there was a correction slip which some fool had forgotten to place in the examination package.

Question 7.
What did Jackson ask Stephens to take away from Evans’ cell and why?
Answer:
Stephens was asked to take away Evans’ razor which he was going to shave and also his nail file. In fact they didn’t want to leave anything with which Evans could do any mischief.

Question 8.
How did the Governor react to the two phone calls he received in quick succession?
Answer:
The Governor received two phone calls in quick succession in the morning. One was from the Examination Board informing him about the correction slip. The second call was from the magistrate’s court asking for the prison van. In fact, both the calls were hoax and part of Evans’ escape plan.

Question 9.
Who was Reverend Stuart McLeery?
Answer:
Reverend Stuart McLeery was a parson. He was appointed by the Examination Board to act as an invigilator for the exam to be conducted in the prison. But in fact the person who came there to invigilate was one of Evans’ accomplices. The real McLeery had been kept tied in his room.

Question 10.
How did the Governor, Oxford Prison describe Evans to the Secretary Examinations Board?
Answer:
The Governor said that Evans was quite a pleasant sort of chap. He had no record of violence. He was one of the stars at the Christmas concert. But he was just a congenital kleptomaniac.

Question 11.
What seating arrangements were made in Evans’ cell for the examination?
Answer:
Two square tables were placed opposite to each other in the cell. One of the tables was placed nearer the cell door. Then Stephens brought two hard chairs. He placed them in front of each table.

Question 12.
What would Stephens see whenever he peeped from the peephole?
Answer:
Whenever Stephens saw through the peephole he found that the scene was much or less the same. Evans, his pen between his lips, sat staring straight in front of him towards the door. And opposite him, McLeery seated slightly askew from the table.

Question 13.
What was the scene at the D-wing when Stephens went there after McLeery had left?
Answer:
When Stephens re-entered D Wing, walked to Evans’ cell and opened the peephole, he saw a man was fallen back in Evans’ chair. A grey blanket was slipping from his shoulders and his closely cropped hair were covered with fierce red blood.

Question 14.
What did Evans tell the Governor about the blood on his head?
Answer:
The Governor asked Evans how he got that blood to pour over his head. At this Evans replied that it was a pig’s blood that the person disguised as McLeery brought with him in a little rubber ring. They had got to mix with trisodium citrate to stop it clotting.

Question 15.
What kind of a person was Evans?
Answer:
Evans was quite a pleasant sort of fellow. There was no record of violence against him. At prison, he was one of the stars at Christmas concert. But he was a kleptomaniac. The police would often arrest him. But he was very clever. He always managed to escape from prison. Therefore the prison officers would call him ‘Evans the Break’.

Question 16.
Did the exam go as scheduled?
Answer:
The exam did not go as scheduled. The exam was scheduled to start at 9.15 a.m. Stephens took some time to frisk McLeery. When the exam was just going to begin, Evans objected Stephens’ presence there in his cells. The Governor asked Stephens to come out of the prison. At last the exam started at 9.25.

Question 17.
Did the clues left behind on the question pa¬per put Evans back in prison again?
Answer:
The injured McLerry said he knew where Evans had gone. He pointed towards the question paper. A photocopied sheet had been carefully and cleverly superimposed over the last but blank page. McLeery said that Evans had gone to Elsfield Way. But the person impersonating McLeery was in fact Evans himself. The clues left on the question paper were to misguide the police.

Question 18.
Where did Evans go?
Answer:
Evans went to a hotel named Golden Lion at Chipping Norton.

Question 19.
Did the injured McLeery help the prison officers to track Evans?
Answer:
The person who pretended to be injured was not McLeery. He was Evans himself. Actually he produced some such clues which were to put the police on the wrong track. Thus, he did not help the prison officers to track Evans.

Question 20.
While we condemn the crime, we are sympa-thetic to the criminal. Is this the reason why prison staff develop a soft corner for those is custody?
Answer:
It is commonly said that we should hate the crime and not the criminal. One may become criminal due to some compulsion. The best way to remove crime from the society is to reform criminals. Harsh punishment often makes the convicts hardened criminals. When a criminal is sent to prison, the prison staff treat him as a human being. The crime committed by him generally becomes a thing of the past. Therefore the prison staff develop a soft corner for those in custody.

Question 21.
Do you agree that between crime and punishment it is mainly a battle of wits?
Answer:
Yes, it is certainly a battle of wits between crime and punishment. The criminals generally prove too smart for the police officers. They generally guess what the next step of the police would be. The same thing happens in the present story. Evans very easily be fools the entire prison staff from the beginning to the end. He escapes under the very nose of the Governor.

Evans Tries an O-level Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1
Who checked McLeery’s suitcase and why? What things had McLeery brought with him?
Answer:
Mcleery’s suitcase was opened by Jackson. The prison people did not have any doubt on McLeery but they thought that innocently he might have brought something which Evans could use to hold him as a hostage. Jackson picked up each envelope in turn, carefully passed his palms along the surfaces and seemed satisfied.

But one of the objects puzzled him the most. It was an inflated ring of about twelve inches circumference. At this, McLeery explained that he was suffering from haemorrhoids and he needed it when he had to sit for some time.

Besides that there were a sealed question-paper envelope, a yellow invigilation form, a special authentication card from the Examination Board, a paper- knife, a Bible and a copy of‘The Church Times’. Jackson took the paperknife from there.

Question 2.
Describe the precautions taken by the prison officers to prevent Evans from escaping?
Answer:
All the measures were taken to prevent Evans from escaping. The governor decided to inspect all the arrangements. The examination was conducted in the prisoner’s cell. It was locked from outside with a heavy lock. A device was placed so that the conversation could be heard. All the objectionable objects of Evans were taken away. Even the invigilator was frisked.

His paper knife was taken away by Jackson. There was a peephole in the door of the cell and Stephens was asked to peep through it every minute. The prison staff wanted to take no chance with Evans. But Evans proved too smart for them. In spite of all these arrangements he managed to escape.

Question 3.
Where did the Governor find Evans? How was he able to locate that place?
Answer:
After a gentle stroll round the centre of Chipping Norton, Evans decided to return to the hotel. He collected his keys from the receptionist and went up the stairs to his room. He unlocked the door and closed it quietly behind him. But he was frozen to the spot when he saw on the bed the very last man in the world he had wanted to see.

That man was the Governor.Evans asked him how he, came to know that he would be in the Golden Lion Hotel. The Governor told him with the help of the correction slip. Then Evans wanted to know how he came to know about the location of the hotel since there would be thousands of the same name. At this, the Governor said that from the Index number 313; centre number 271. When took an Ordnance Survey Map for Oxfordshire, he found the place was in the centre of Chipping Norton.

Question 4.
How far was Stephens helpful for Evans’ escape?
Answer:
Stephens was a newly recruited officer in the prison. He was very particular about showing his efficiency ” in front of the higher authorities. He was especially glad that he was in charge of Evans’ examination. However he forget that to handle such a criminal like Evans could he risky for a novice like him. Evans complained of Stephens’ breathing and got him naturally out of the cell. Once out of the cell, Stephens kept peeping into the cell but soon fed up with.

To show that he was very confident and efficient, he left the cell door to come after short intervals. The short intervals soon became longer and very longer giving time for Evans to dress himself up inside the cell. Stephens was taken to the highest joy when he received the fake call from the Governor to take the invigilator out of the prison. He in his pride took the invigilator out of the prison and made way for Evans’ escape in a wonderful way.

Question 5.
Write a brief character-sketch of the Governor?
Answer:
The Governor was a dutiful officer. He took all precautions for the smooth conduct of the examination. But he was a bit too over-confident. No doubt that the Governor knew a little German and he deduced that Evans tactful be at a hotel Golden Lion. And from the index number and centre number he was able to find out that the hotel would be located at the centre of Chippping Norton.

But instead of going there with full police force he went there alone. He had already seen that Evans had been fooling them since morning. He handed him over to the prison officer whom he had never seen before. It did not occur to him that the prison officer could also be one of Evans accomplices.

And that was exactly the case. As a result, Evans was able to escape once again. So we can say that he was just a good-for-a-giggle, gullible person.

Question 6.
What were the precautions taken for the smooth conduct of the examination?
Answer:
All precautions were taken for the smooth conduct of the examination. The Governor decided to keep a close eye over the whole affair. The examination was conducted in the cell of the prisoner. The door of the cell was locked. The cell was thoroughly searched before the day of examination.

Evans’ nail file, razor and any other thing that could help in his escape was removed from there. The prison officers put a device over the door of the cell so that the Governor could hear all the conversation going during the examination.

Even the invigilator McLeery was thoroughly frisked before the start of the ex¬amination. Stephens was posted outside the cell. He was asked to peep through the peephole to see that everything was going smoothly. However all this arrangements proved futile and Evans managed to escape from prison.

Question 7.
Did the Governor and his staff finally heave a sigh of relief ?
Answer:
The Governor and his staff had a sigh of relief for a few minutes only. After Stephens had escorted McLeery out of the prison gates, he decided to have a look at Evans. He found that a man badly wounded was sitting in Evans chair. He immediately concluded that Evans had run away after hitting McLeery on . his head. He raised alarm and panic spread everywhere.

The wounded McLeery said that he knew where Evans had gone. But the person who pretended to be wounded was not McLeery. He was Evans himself. Actually he produced some such clues which were to put the police on the wrong track. The prison officers thinking him to be McLeeiy provided him ambulance. Thus Evans again escaped from the prison. Thus, there was no relief for the Governor but only trouble.

Question 8.
Reflecting on the story, what did you feel about Evans’ having the last laugh?
Answer:
‘Having the last laugh’ means to have a final victory over one’s rival. By taking the hint from the question paper, the Governor reached the hotel where Evans was and captured him and came to know how he planned his escape and said that his game was over.

Evans surrendered himself to the Governor. The Governor told Evans that they would meet soon. But Evans still had a last card in his ‘ sleeve.The moment the Governor was away, the so called ‘ prison officer-a friend of Evans-unlocked the handcuffs and asked the driver to move fast and Evans told him to turn to Newbury. Evans, thus, has the last laugh.

Question 9.
When Stephens comes back to the cell he jumps to a conclusion and the whole machinery blindly goes by his assumption without even checking the identity of the injured ‘McLeery’. Does this show how hasty conjectures can prevent one from seeing the obvious? How is the criminal able to predict such negligence?
Answer:
Evans was a smart criminal. He had beforehand assessed the weaknesses of the jail officers successfully. Stephens was a new recruit to the prison set up. When he saw the injured McLeery in the cell he at once jumped to the conclusion that Evans had escaped from the prison. He did not even check who he really was and neither did anyone else. It did not occur to anyone to question how there could there be two persons one in the cell and the other who had been escorted out by Stephens.

It was for this very reason that friends of Evans, who, posing as the Governor on the phone, have directed Stephens that he himself should escort the parson out, when the exam is finished. The Governor and his officers, lead Evans out of the prison. The question paper is left behind to mislead the Governor. This shows that Evans type criminals had enough time to study the behaviour patterns of the jail officers and plan their strategy well.

Question 10.
What could the Governor have done to securely bring back Evans to prison when he caught him at the Golden Lion? Does that final act of foolishness really prove that ‘he was just another good-for-a giggle, gullible Governor that was all’?
Answer:
No doubt that the Governor knew a little German and he deduced that Evans could be at a hotel Golden Lion. And from the index number and centre number he was able to find out that the hotel would be located at the centre of Chippping Norton. But instead of going there with full police force, he went there alone. He had already seen that Evans had been fooling them since morning.

He handed him over to the prison officer whom he had never seen before. It did not occur to him that the prison officer could also be one of Evans accomplices. And that was exactly the case. As a result, Evans was able to escape once again. Thus this final act of foolishness of the Governor proved that he was just a good-for- a-giggle, gullible person.

Here we are providing On the face of It Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas, Extra Questions for Class 12 English was designed by subject expert teachers.

On the face of It Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas

On the face of It Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What is the bond that unites the two, Mr Lamb and Derry? How does Mr Lamb inspire the boy?
Answer:
Mr Lamb and Derry are suffering from the same sort of physical impairment. Mr Lamb does not have one leg while Derry’s face is burnt from one side. They both are feeling lonely. No one ever comes to see Mr Lamb and people have spread many stories about him. People look at awe at Derry’s face and generally avoid him. Thus they both are suffering from common problems. This bond unites Mr Lamb and Derry.

Question 2.
Who is Mr Lamb?
Answer:
Mr Lamb is an old man. He is retired from the army. He has lost one of his legs in a bomb blast. He lives alone in a house that has a garden. No one ever comes to visit him. Kids call him Lamey Lamb. People have spread stories about him.

Question 3.
What peculiar things does Derry notice about the old man, Lamb?
Answer:
Mr Lamb is retired from the army. He leaves his doors always open. Everybody is welcomed in his garden. There are no curtains on his windows. These are quite peculiar things for Derry.

Question 4.
What physical impairment is Mr Lamb suffering from?
Answer:
Mr Lamb lost one of his legs in a war. There is a tin leg in its place. The children would mockingly call him ‘Lamey Lamb’. Also, no one ever comes to see him. People have spread many stories about him.

Question 5.
Why had Derry come to the garden?
Answer:
Derry had thought it was an empty place and no one lived there. He wanted to see what kind of place it was. He had no mind to steal any apple.

Question 6.
In what sense is the friendship between Mr Lamb and Derry fruitful?
Answer:
The friendship between Mr Lamb and Derry proved quite fruitful for both of them. Mr Lamb instils self confidence in the young boy. While the young boy’s company helps Mr Lamb to ward off his loneliness.

Question 7.
Why does Derry say people are afraid of him?
Answer:
Derry says people look at his face and call it a terrible thing. They call it the ugliest thing they ever saw. Therefore according to Derry, people are afraid of him.

Question 8.
Why does Derry tell Mr Lamb that he is afraid of seeing himself in the mirror in the play, ‘On the Face of It’?
Answer:
One side of Derry’s face is burnt. Acid had fallen on this side. His face looked very ugly. People would always keep on reminding of his face. Therefore Derry tells Mr Lamb that he is afraid of seeing himself in the mirror.

Question 9.
How does Mr Lamb try to remove the baseless fears of Derry?
Answer:
Mr Lamb tells Derry that he, like others, has two eyes, two ears, two legs, two arms, brain and a tongue. He can do or achieve whatever he likes. In this way Mr Lamb tries to remove baseless fears of Derry.

Question 10.
What did Derry’s mother think of Mr Lamb?
Answer:
Derry’s mother did not have any good opinion about Mr Lamb. She considered him to be a worthless man. She thought that Mr Lamb’s talk was all nonsense. She did not want Derry to go there.

Question 11.
How does Mr Lamb react when Derry enters his garden?
Answer:
Mr Lamb welcomes Derry in his garden. He only asks him to mind crab apples lest he should trip. When Derry wants to run away from there Mr Lamb says that he need not go. Everyone is welcomed to come in his garden.

Question 12.
What kind of garden does Mr Lamb have? Why does he like it?
Answer:
Mr Lamb has a garden-outside his house. It has flowers, grass, trees arid bees. He likes every inch of his garden. He has positive attitude of mind. For him even weeds in his garden are living things. He likes humming of bees. He passes his time by making jam from the crab apples. Thus, he remains busy due to his garden. Therefore, he likes it very much.

Question 13.
What does Derry hear people talking down the downstairs?
Answer:
He hears people talking about him and saying, “What will he ever do? What is going to happen to him when we are gone? How will he get on in this world with that face?”

Question 14.
What realisation comes to Derry about his face at the end of the play?
Answer:
At the end of the play, Derry realises that external looks do not matter much. The only thing matters is the person’s worth. He decides now he would not care about anybody. He will care about what he feels, thinks or hears.

On the face of It Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Narrate the first meeting between Mr Lamb and Derry?
Answer:
The first meeting between Mr Lamb and Derry takes place in Mr Lamb’s garden. A teenager named Derry comes into the garden. He thinks that no one is in the garden. But then he hears Mr Lamb’s voice,” “Mind the apples.” Derry is startled to hear that voice. He has thought that no one was there in the garden. He wants to run way from there but Mr Lamb says that he is most welcomed in the garden.

Derry sits beside Mr Lamb. They have heart to heart talk. They thoroughly enjoy each other’s company. Mr Lamb has been retired from the army. One of his legs had been blown due to a bomb blast. Nobody comes to visit him. People have spread many stories about him. Children mockingly call him ‘Lamey Lamb’. The condition of Derry is also not much different. One side of his face is burnt due to acid.

Question 2.
Why do you think Derry is so pessimistic? How does Mr Lamb give solace to the boy?
Answer:
One side of Derry’s face is burnt due to acid. People look at him in awe. They say that it is the ugliest’ thing that they have ever seen. Derry feels afraid of him when he sees himself in the mirror. He has become highly pessimistic. He knows even his mother doesn’t love him truly. She just fulfils her duty as a mother.

Therefore, she never kisses him on the burnt side of his face; she would always kiss on the other side of his face.But Lamb gives the boy great solace and inspiration. He tells him he is not handicapped like him. He has two legs, two eyes, two ears and two hands. He can do anything in life. He also advises him to have optimistic approach in life.

Question 3.
What lesson of life does Mr Lamb tell Derry? What effect it has on him?
Answer:
Mr Lamb has lost one of his legs in a war. He tells Derry he is not handicapped like him. He has two legs, two eyes, two ears and two hands. He can do anything in life. He also advises him to have optimistic approach in life. Then he starts explaining Derry about his own approach towards life. He says every¬thing interests him that is created by God.

He says that people say the bees buzz but according to him . they hum. According to Lamb, every growing thing has life in it. For him even weeds are important. He tells Derry that it’s not what he looks like; it’s what he is inside. This makes Derry understand that beauty is only skin deep. He understands that he is not inferior to anybody. He can do whatever he likes.

Question 4.
How did Mr Lamb’s meeting with Derry become a turning point in Derry’s life?
Answer:
Mr Lamb’s meeting with Derry indeed proved to be. a turning point in a young boy’s life. One side of Derry’s face was burnt due to acid. People looked at him in awe. They would say that it was the ugliest thing that they have ever seen. Derry felt afraid of him when he saw himself in the mirror. He had become highly pessimistic. He knew even his mother didn’t love him truly. She would just fulfil her duty as a mother. Therefore, she never kissed him on the burnt side of his face; she would always kiss on the other side of his face.

But Lamb gave the boy great solace and inspiration. He told him he was not handicapped like him. He had two legs, two eyes two ears and two hands. He could do anything in life. He also advised him to have optimistic approach in life. Thus, this meeting proved to be a turning point in Derry’s life. Now he doesn’t care what others say.

Question 5.
How did Mr Lamb try to give courage and confidence to Derry?
Answer:
Mr Lamb was retired from the army. He had lost one of his legs due to bomb blast. He met Derry for the first time in his garden. One side of Derry’s face is burnt due to acid. As a result, Derry had become quite pessimistic in his life. But Mr Lamb told him he was not handicapped like him. He had two legs, two eyes, two ears and two hands. He could do anything in life. He also advised him to have optimistic approach in life. Then he started explaining Derry about his own approach towards life.

He said everything interested him that was created by God. He said that people would say the bees buzz but according to him, they hum. According to Lamb, every growing thing had life in it. For him, even weeds were important. He told Derry that it was not what he looked like; it was what he was inside. Now Derry came to understand that beauty is only skin deep.

Question 6.
Both Derry and Lamb are victims of physical impairment, but much more painful for them is the feeling of loneliness. Comment.
Answer:
If a person is constantly reminded of his physical impairment, he will feel a great mental pain. This pain is much more than the pain of actual physical impairment. The same thing is with Derry and Lamb, One side of Derry’s face has been burnt due to acid. People look at him with a sense of fear or shock. They would say that it is a terrible thing. Some would show sympathy towards him. A woman looks at him and says, “That it is a face only a mother could love.” It will give Derry a great pain. Even the people at his own home don’t treat him well.

They think him to be a burden. Even his mother would not kiss him on the burnt side. She would always kiss him on the other side. Derry is deeply hurt at all this. He wants to run away from his house. Lamb has lost one of his legs due to bomb blast. Nobody ever comes to meet him. Children mockingly call him ‘Lamey Lamb’. Thus for both of them the more painful is the feeling of loneliness.

Question 7.
Derry sneaked into Mr Lamb’s garden and it became a turning point in his life. Comment.
Answer:
Mr Lamb’s meeting with Derry indeed proved to be a turning point in a young boy’s life. One side of Derry’s face was burnt due to acid. People looked at him in awe. They would say that it was the ugliest thing that they have ever seen. Derry felt afraid of him when he saw himself in the mirror. He had become highly pessimistic. He knew even his mother didn’t love him truly.

She would just fulfil her duty as a mother. Therefore she never kissed him on the burnt side of his face; she would always kiss on the other side of his face. But Lamb gave the boy great solace and inspiration. He told him he was not handicapped like him. He had two legs, two eyes two ears and two hands. He could do anything in life. He also advised him to have optimistic approach in life. Thus this meeting proved to be a turning point in Derry’s life. Now he doesn’t care what others say.

Question 8.
Who is Mr Lamb? How does Derry get into his garden?
Answer:
Mr Lamb is an old man. He is retired from the army. He has lost his one leg in the war. Now, a tin leg has been there in place of his original leg. People have spread many stories about him. Hardly anyone comes to see him. He is living a lonely life. The children in the street call him Lamey-Lamb. His house has a lovely garden. Mr Lamb always keeps the gate of his garden open.

Everyone is welcomed in his garden. Derry does not come into the garden by the gate, instead he climbs over the garden wall. He does not want that anyone should notice his entry. Therefore, he climbs over the garden wall. The second thing is one part of his face is burnt due to acid. He does not want that anyone should notice his ugly face and run away.

Question 9.
What is it that draws Derry towards Mr Lamb in spite of himself?
Answer:
Both Derry and Mr Lamb are suffering from the same sort of problem. Mr Lamb is living a lonely life. He has lost one of his legs in a war. People have spread many stories about him. The children would mock at him and call him ‘Lamey Lamb’. No one comes to see him.

The condition of Derry is not much different. Half side of his face has been burnt with acid. People would look at him with awe. They would say what he would do in his life. Even Derry thinks that members of his own family avoid him.

When the two, Mr Lamb and Derry, meet with each other, they have heart to heart talking. Mr Lamb talks to him lovingly. He says that all the living things are beautiful. He also encourages Derry by saying that since he has two legs, two hands two ears, two eyes and two hands, he can do anything. It is by such words of encouragement that Derry is drawn towards Mr Lamb.

Question 10.
In which section of the play does Mr Lamb display signs of loneliness and disappointment? What are the ways in which Mr Lamb tries to overcome these feelings?
Answer:
At the end of the first scene Mr Lamb shows signs of loneliness and disappointment. He says that everyone says that they will come but no one ever comes back. This shows how much loneliness that old man feels. It is natural because people have spread many stories about him. No one comes to see him. The children would mock at him calling him, ‘Lamey- Lamb’.

He finds in Derry a good friend. They have heart to heart chat for long hours. Derry goes away saying that he will soon come. He feels like others Derry would also not come. He tries to overcome his feelings of loneliness by watching, listening and thinking. He had no curtains on his windows since he loves to have natural light. He finds no difference between flowers, trees, herbs and weeds. It is by such thoughts that he tries to overcome his loneliness and disappointment.

Question 11.
The actual pain or inconvenience caused by a physical impairment is often much less than the sense of alienation felt by the person with disabilities. What is the kind of behaviour that the person expects from others?
Answer:
If a person is constantly reminded of his physical impairment, he will feel a great mental pain. This pain is much more than the pain of actual physical impairment. The same-thing happens in Derry’s case. One side of his face has been burnt due to acid. People look at him in a sense of fear or shock. They would say that it is a terrible thing.

Some would show sympathy towards him. A woman looks at and says, “That it is a face only a mother could love.” It will give Derry a great pain. Even the people at his own home don’t treat him well. They think him to ‘ be a burden. Even his mother would not kiss him on the burnt side. She would always kiss him on the other side. Derry is deeply hurt at all this. He wants to run away from his house.

Question 12.
Will Derry get back to his old seclusion or will Mr Lamb’s brief association effect a change in the kind of life he will lead in the future?
Arts.
There is little chance of Derry going back to his old seclusion. Now he has gained a lot of self-confidence. Mr Lamb has told him that like every other person Derry has two eyes, two legs, two hands, two ears and two hands. He can do anything he likes. Derry has been a very pessimistic boy. But Mr Lamb gives him a lot of confidence.

His words of encouragement bring about a total change in the attitude and perspective of Derry towards life. Now he does not care about how he looks like. Now he wants to live life in his own way. Therefore he decides to leave his home and live with Mr Lamb. He understands that beauty is only skin deep.

Here we are providing Should Wizard hit Mommy Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas, Extra Questions for Class 12 English was designed by subject expert teachers.

Should Wizard hit Mommy Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas

Should Wizard hit Mommy Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
When would Jack tell her daughter, Jo, a story? When had this custom begun?
Answer:
Jo’s father Jack used to tell her a story in the evenings and for Saturday naps. This custom began when Jo was two but now she was four years old. Thus, he had been telling her the stories for the last two years.

Question 2.
What base tale had the each story?
Or
What was the basic plot of each story told by Jack?
Answer:
Each story would have a same base tale and it would come out from Jack’s own head. In each tale there would be a small creature, usually named Roger (Roger Fish, Roger Squirrel, Roger Chipmunk, etc.). It would have some problem and a wizard would solve that problem.

Question 3.
What is mother skunk’s role in the story?
Answer:
he wizard gave the skunk the fragrance of roses. When he entered his home his mother became very angry at this smell. He took Roger with her to wizard and hit him on his head with her umbrella. The wizard gave back the skunk his original smell.

Question 4.
What problem did Roger Skunk face when he went to play with his friends? How did he solve it?
Answer:
Roger Skunk smelled very bad. No one liked to play with him due to the foul smell emitted from his body. A wizard with the help of his magic wand and spell gave him the fragrance of roses. In this way his problem was solved.

Question 5.
Why did Roger Skunk go to the owl? What advice did he get?
Answer:
Roger Skunk smelled very bad. No creature would like to play with him. He went to the owl to get his advice in this regard.

Question 6.
How did the wizard solve .the skunk’s problem?
Answer:
The wizard asked the skunk what he wanted to smell like. At this the skunk told her that he wanted to smell like roses. The wizard took his magic wand and chanted a spell. Soon, the whole inside of the wizard’s house was filled with the fragrance of roses.

Question 7.
What ‘new phase’ had come in Jo?
Answer:
Jo was no longer a passive listener. She had become quite inquisitive. She would ask questions if something was not clear to her. Sometimes, her questions would put Jack in an awkward situation. He felt that his head had become empty.

Question 8.
How did Jo want the Roger Skunk to end?
Answer:
In the Roger Skunk story, the skunk’s mother hit the wizard on his head and wizard agreed to her. But Jo didn’t like this end of the story. She wanted that the wizard should have hit the mommy back. According to her the wizard had done nothing wrong.

Question 9.
Which do you think is a better ending of Roger V Skunk’s story, Jo’s or father’s? Why?
Answer:
I think Jo’s father’s ending of the story is better. On the face of it, the reader may think that the mommy had done something bad by hitting the gentle wizard. But we must remember that foul smell is the characteristic feature of the skunks and it protects them from predators. Roger’s mother only wanted to ensure the safety of her child.

Question 10.
Why did Jo think Roger Skunk was better off with the new smell?
Answer:
Roger Skunk’s friends would avoid him because of the foul smell of his body. The wizard gave him the fragrance of roses. Now all his friends would play with him. Therefore, Jo thought that Roger Skunk was.better off with the new smell.

Question 11.
Why does Jo insist that her father should tell her the story with a different ending?
Answer:
Jo is just a child of four. Her perspective of life is different from her father. She does not know about the harsh realities of life. According to her, Roger Skunk was quite happy to play with her friends. But she doesn’t know that the foul smell is the characteristic feature of a skunk.

Question 12.
Who is Jo? How does she respond to her father’s story-telling?
Answer:
Jo is a little girl of about four. When she was two years old her father started the tradition of telling her story in the evenings apd Saturday naps. The little girl would sleep while listening to the story. But now she is about four. She has become quite inquisitive. She never sleeps while listening to the story. On the other hand, she would ask her father many questions.

Jack would find it difficult to answer her questions. He started feeling that her head has become empty. Now he realizes that the reality phase has come to the life of child. She now does not take the things on their face. She always wants to know the true reason for everything.

Question 13.
What do you think was Jo’s problem?
Answer:
In fact, there was no problem with Jo. Now she was in the growing phase of her life. Like other children of her age she did not take the things at their face value. She had become very inquisitive. She wanted to know the reason behind each thing.

Question 14.
How does Jo want the story to end and why?
Answer:
In this story the mommy hits the wizard on his head with no fault of his. Now Jo wants that the wizard should hit the mommy back on her head. Since Roger Skunk himself had requested for the fragrance of roses therefore the wizard had done nothing wrong. And the mommy could not be justified in her act of hitting the wizard.

Question 15.
Why does Jack insist that it was the wizard that was hit and not the mother?
Answer:
Jack does not want that Jo should form any negative opinion about a mommy. He wants her to form the idea that a mommy should be loved and respected by the child. His perspective towards life is entirely different as compared to his daughter. He insists that the little skunk’s mommy loves him very much. Therefore she wants that no harm should come to him. Thus in his own way he justifies his hitting of the wizard.

Question 16.
What makes Jack feel caught in an ugly middle position?
Answer:
Jo is a little girl of about four. She could not digest the end suggested by her father to a story about a skunk. In this story, the mommy hit the wizard with her umbrella without any of his fault. Now Jo doesn’t like this end at once. She wants that wizard should hit mommy back. This puts Jo’s father Jack in an ugly middle position.

Question 17.
Why is an adult’s perspective on life different from that of a child’s?
Answer:
An adult has his own likes and dislikes. He views life from his own vision. He has his own prejudices. But on the other hand child is free from any such preconceived notions. His responses are very clear. A child does not tolerate any injustice. Unlike an adult, he does not make any compromises. There¬fore an adult’s perspective on life is different from that of a child’s.

Should Wizard hit Mommy Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How does Jo want the story to end and why?
Answer:
Jo is just a child of four. She does not know about the harsh realities of life. In the story told by her father, Roger Skunk was given the fragrance of roses because he wanted that. For Roger it was a moment of happiness since now he could enjoy with his friends. For a child life is nothing more than a play. Therefore Jo thinks that Skunk’s mother had done something very wrong by hitting the gentle wizard. She wanted that the story should be ended in a different way.

She thought that the wizard had given Roger the fragrance of roses because he wanted to smell like roses. According to her, the wizard was not at all at fault. But Roger’s mother had unnecessarily hit him on his head. Jo thought that the mommy had not done the right thing. She wanted that the wizard should retaliate and hit the mommy back.

Question 2.
What impression do you form of Jack as a father?
Answer:
Jack is a very loving father. He loves his daughter, Jo, very much. He tells her a story in the evenings and for afternoon naps. He just wants to amuse his daughter in this way. Each of the stories comes out of his own head. Now Jo has grown up. Now she is four years old. She has become very inquisitive. Sometimes Jack finds it very difficult to answer her questions.

One day, he tells her a story of Roger Skunk. Roger Skunk smelled very bad. All his friends would run away from him. Then with the help of a wizard, he got the fragrance of roses. His mother became very angry when she found that: She immediately went to the wizard and hit him on his head. At this the wizard returned the skunk his original smell. But Jo did not agree with this ending. She wants that the wizard should have hit the iribmmy back. But Jack as a father does not want that the child should form any unfavourable opinion about her mother.

Question 3.
Roger Skunk’s mother finds the smell of roses detestable on Roger, implying that he should accept himself as he is. Adults as well as young people are often misjudging issues, people and circumstances based on appearance. Is an ob¬session for disappearance us to appreciate our true selves? Explain.
Answer:
It is said that appearances are often deceptive. It is person’s internal beauty that matters. In this story, Roger Skunk is annoyed at his natural smell. It is the law of nature that everyereature is given some protective device to save itself from its enemy. The . foul smell of the skunks keeps the predators away. But Roger Skunk does not like his particular skunk smell. His only concern is his playmates that run away from him due to his foul smell. Therefore, he goes to the wizard and gets the fragrance of the roses.

When he enters his home his mommy becomes very angry. She goes to the wizard and hits him on his head and Roger gets back his original and natural smell.Not only the kids but also the adults are obsessed with external beauty. Demand for fair-complexioned bride or handsome groom is there in the matrimonial columns of every newspaper. But we must remember that beauty is skin deep. We can’t judge any person’s worth on the basis of his/her appearance.

Question 4.
How did Jack end the Roger Skunk story? How and why did Jo want to change it?
Answer:
In the story, a skunk named Roger Skunk was very annoyed at the smell of his body. His body emitted a very foul smell. No other creature would like to play with him. He went to the Wise Owl. The owl told him to go the wizard. The wizard gave the skunk the smell of roses. He became very happy.

He played with his friends. But when he went to his home, his mommy became very angry. She asked him as to who give him that smell. The skunk replied that it was the wizard. The mommy took the skunk to the wizard. She hit the wizard with her umbrella. The wizard gave the skunk back again his foul smell. But Jo did not like the end suggested by his father. She wanted that the wizard should hit the mommy

Question 4.
What is the moral issue that the story raises?
Answer:
This story raises a very pertinent question. The question is Are the elders ever right? We can say after reading this story we can easily say that many a time elders is wrong. They must learn from the younger ones. In the story told by Jack to his daughter the wizard gave smell of roses to the skunk because the latter wanted that.

But the skunk’s mommy hit him for no fault of his. Jack wanted to justify his action, but his daughter Jo felt that the mommy had done something very wrong and the wizard must have hit her back on her head. The blind obedience by children could not be justified at all. This is the moral issue that this story raises.

Question 5.
What possible plot line could the story continue with?
Answer:
Each of the stories told by Jack had almost the plot line there would be some creature, he would have certain problem, he would go to the Wise Owl, the owl would send it to a wizard and the wizard would solve the creature’s problem. In this story also that a skunk named Roger Skunk was very annoyed at . the smell of his body. His body emitted a Very foul smell. No other creature would like to play with him. He went to the Wise owl. The owl told him to go the wizard. The wizard gave the skunk the smell of roses.

He became very happy. He played with his friends. But when he went to his home his mommy became very angry. She asked him as to who give him that smell. The skunk replied that it was the wizard. The mommy took the skunk to the wizard. She hit the wizard with her umbrella. The wizard gave back again the skunk his foul smell.

Question 6.
What is your stance regarding the two endings to the Roger Skunk story?
Answer:
There are two possible stances regarding the ending of this story. The first stance is a child’s stance. She feels that the mommy had not done right in hitting the wizard. The wizard should have hit the mommy back on her head. But Jack has his own perspective. He does not want that the child should form any negative opinion about her mommy.

Besides this the foul smell is a characteristic feature of a skunk that keeps the predators away. Therefore the writer has titled this story ‘Should Wizard Hit Mommy?’ In this way, it is up to us which stance we take. But according to me, both Jack and Jo are right in their stances.

Here we are providing The Enemy Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas, Extra Questions for Class 12 English was designed by subject expert teachers.

The Enemy Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas

The Enemy Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What was his father’s chief eoncern about Dr Sadao?
Answer:
Sadao’s father was very serious about his son’s future. He would never joke or play with him. His father’s chief concern was his son’s education. Therefore Sadao was sent to America at the age of twenty-two to learn all that could be learned of surgery and medicine.

Question 2.
In what condition did Dr Sadao find the American soldier at the seashore?
Answer:
The American soldier was badly wounded and the t sand on one side of him had already a stain of red soaking through. On the right side of his lower back Sadao saw that a gun wound had been reopened. If immediate treatment was not given to the man he would certainly die.

Question 3.
What role did the American professor play in bringing Sadao and Hana together?
Answer:
Both Hana and Sadao met at the professor’s house. Sadao started liking Hana. Though the professor’s wife was very voluble yet they were kind people and Sadao also started living there as a paying guest. Thus we can say that the American professor and his wife proved instrumental in bringing Sadao and Hana together.

Question 4.
What was Dr Sadao’s father dream for his son ? How did Sadao realise it?
Answer:
Dr Sadao’ father wanted his son to be an educated and successful man. He never played or joked with him. Sadao was sent to America to learn everything about surgery and medicine. Eventually, Sadao became one of the most famous surgeons and scientists of Japan. In this way Sadao realised his father’s dream.

Question 5.
Why did Dr Sadao treat the American soldier even though it was an unpatriotic act on his part?
Answer:
As a doctor Dr Sadao’s was trained he should never let a person die if he could help. Thus it was nothing unpatriotic on part of Dr Sadao. He even told the old General about the soldier. Dr Sadao only performed his duty and saved the life of a human being not an American.

Question 6.
The General did not take any action against Dr Sadao even when he came to know about his sheltering of the American soldier?
Answer:
The General needed Dr Sadao’s services as a doctor and surgeon for his treatment. He himself told Dr Sadao that no one in the entire Japan is so capable to save his life. Any action against Dr Sadao would also lead to his own death.

Question 7.
How did Hana help Dr Sadao?
Answer:
Hana helped her husband in the operation. She her-self washed the man. While Sadao performed the operation, Hana helped him in giving the anaesthetic. She acted as a nurse while her husband was performing the operation.

Question 8.
Why had Hana to wash the wounded man her-self?
Answer:
Hana asked the governess, Yumi, of her baby to help to wash the man. But Yumi bluntly refused saying she had never washed a white man and would never wash one. Moreover that man was their enemy. Therefore Hana had to wash the man herself.

Question 9.
How could you say that the American was tortured? Who could have tortured him?
Answer:
There were red scars on the back side of the neck of the American. It clearly showed that the man was badly tortured. The Japanese General Takima was a very cruel man. He must have tortured the man.

Question 10.
Why did the servants leave Dr Sadao’s house?
Answer:
Dr Sadao had given shelter to an enemy soldier. According to the servants, it was an act of treason. They looked upon the Americans as their enemies since Japan and America were at war. When they found that instead of handing over the enemy soldier to the police, Dr Sadao had decided to treat him, they decided to leave his house.

Question 11.
Why was Dr Sadao not sent to the battlefield?
Answer:
Dr Sadao was a famous surgeon and scientist of Japan. He was perfecting a discovery to make the wounds completely clean. Besides, he was treating the old General. The General might need an opertation any time. Therefore, Dr Sadao was not sent to the battlefield.

Question 12.
How did Dr Sadao get rid of the enemy soldier?
Answer:
Dr Sadao had saved the man with great efforts. He didn’t want him to hand over to the police and get him killed. Therefore he decided to help the man get away in his boat’ He loaded his boat with sufficient provisions. He asked the man to row the boat to a nearby island.

Question 13.
How did Dr Sadao take bullet out of the body of the American soldier?
Answer:
Dr Sadao had to perfom an opertation to take bullet out of the body of the American soldier. The soldier was given anaesthetic. Dr Sadao felt the tip of his instrument with some hard object. It was a bullet. Then Dr Sadao probed with his fingers and took out the bullet with cleanest possible manner.

Question 14.
What was the second thing that happened in the afternoon? Why did this frighten the doctor’s wife, Hana too much?
Answer:
In the afternoon, the second thing happened. A mes-senger came to their house in official’uniform. Hana became quite frightened. She thought that perhaps he had come to arrest her husband. But the man wanted Dr. Sadao to come with him as the old General was in pain.

Question 15.
How did the General react on Dr Sadao’s story . about harbouring the enemy soldier?
Answer:
Dr Sadao went to the old General and narrated him the whole story. He also told him since he had done great effort to save that man and he didn’t want him to hand over the police. Now, the General offered him to send his private assassins. He said that they were very competent and expert in internal bleeding.

Question 16.
Why do you think that the General spare the American soldier?
Answer:
The old General was very selfish. He knew if the matter about the enemy soldier had come to light,Dr Sadao would come to a great trouble. He might be arrested for treason. The General did not want it happen. He needed Dr Sadao’s services for his treatment.

Question 17.
Did Hana think that the Japanese torture their prisoners of war? Why?
Answer:
Yes, Hana did think that the Japanese torture their prisoners of war. She found red scars on the back-side of the neck of the American soldier. It was a clear fact that he was tortured badly by the Japanese.

Question 18.
Why did Sadao wait to fall in love with Hana?
Answer:
Sadao had met Hana in America, but he had waited to fall in love with her until he was sure she was Japanese. He knew his father would only accept any girl who had been pure in her race.

Question 19.
Who was Dr Sadao? Where was his house?
Ana.
Dr Sadao was a famous Japanese surgeon and scientist. He was perfecting a discovery to make wounds completely clean. His house was set upon rocks well above a narrow beach that was outlined with bent pines.

Question 20.
Was Dr Sadao arrested on the charge of harbouring, an enemy?
Answer:
No, Dr Sadao not arrested on the charge of harbouring an enemy. He has already told the old General about the enemy. Also the old General needs his medical help, therefore, he never wanted that any harm may come to Dr Sadao.

Question 21.
Did Hana help the wounded man and wash him herself ?
Answer:
Hana was a very understanding wife. She knew that her husband treated the man though he was the enemy of their country. He would never desist from doing his duty. So she helped her husband and washed the man herself since their maid had refused to do that.

Question 22.
What did Dr Sadao and his wife do with the man?
Answer:
After Dr Sadao’s treatment the man was now out of danger. But still he was very weak. If they handed him over to the police, he was sure to be killed. Therefore, they decided to keep the man with them in their house.

Question 23.
What did Dr Sadao do to get rid of the man?
Answer:
Dr Sadao had saved the man with great efforts. He didn’t want him to hand over to the police and get him killed. Therefore he decided to help the man get away in his boat and he loaded his boat with sufficient provisions. He asked the man to row the boat to a nearby island.

The Enemy Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
To choose between professional loyalty and patriotism was a dilemma for Dr Sadao. How did he succeed in betraying neither?
Answer:
As a doctor, Sadao was taught that he should never let a person die if he could help. One evening, he found a badly injured enemy soldier on the sea beach near his house. The man could die if not given proper medical aid. Now, Dr Sadao decided to perform an opertation on the man though he was an enemy soldier. He tended him well and took great care of him.

In this way Dr Sadao was able to maintain his professional loyalty. But Dr Sadao was a patriotic from the core of his heart. He knew it was an act of treason to harbour an enemy soldier. Therefore, he wrote a letter to the authorities about it and put it in his drawer. He even told the old General everything about the enemy soldier. It is other thing that the General did not take any action against the enemy soldier. But Dr Sadao was able to maintain a perfect balance between his professional loyalty and patriotism.

Question 2.
Good values are far above any other value system. How did Dr Sadao succeed as a doctor as well as a patriot?
Answer:
Dr Sadao is full of finer values of humanity kindness, love for human beings and also love for one’s passion. As a doctor, he is taught not to let a person die if he could help. One evening he found a badly injured enemy soldier on the sea beach near his house. The man could die if not given proper medical aid.

Now Dr Sadao decided to perform an opertation on the man though he was an enemy soldier. He tended him well and took great care of him. In this way Dr Sadao was able to maintain his professional loyalty.

But Dr Sadao was a patriotic from the core of his heart. He knew it was an act of treason to harbour an enemy soldier. Therefore he wrote a letter to the authorities about it and put it in his drawer.He even told the old General everything about the enemy soldier. It is other thing that the General did not take any action against the enemy soldier. Thus, Dr Sadao succeeded as a doctor as well as a patriot.

Question 3.
How can you say that Sadao’s father was very serious about his son’s study?
Answer:
Dr Sadao’s father was very serious about his son’s studies. Dr Sadao’s lived with his father in a house that was situated on the high rocks near the sea beach. He used to play there as a school boy. There were some islands near the Japanese beach. His father would often take him there and told him that those islands there were the stepping stones to the future for Japan. Sadao’s father was very serious about his future. He would never joke or play with him. Sadao knew that his education was his father’s chief concern.

Sadao was sent to America at the age of twenty-two to learn all that could be learned of surgery and medicine. He came back at thirty and eventually became a famous scientist and surgeon. As he was perfecting a discovery which would render wounds entirely clean, he had not been sent abroad with the troop. We can say that because of his father’s efforts, Dr Sadao was able to become a famous surgeon and a scientist.

Question 4.
Explain the reaction of the servants in Dr Sadao’s house when he decided to give shelter to an enemy in the house.
Answer: The servants in Dr Sadao’s house did not like the idea of giving shelter to an enemy soldier. Yumi, the nurse of the doctor’s child bluntly refused to wash the white man. She said that she had never and would never wash a white man. The old gardener was a superstitious man. He said that there was no business in saving the man.

He told Hana bluntly that the white man ought not to be saved. First he had been shot. Then the sea had caught him. But when they found that Dr Sadao was not going to hand over the man to the authorities they thought that he had turned traitor. They decided to leave his house.

Question 5.
Write in brief the character-sketch of General Takima.
Answer:
General Takima was an old Japanese General. He was a very cruel person. He used to beat his wife mercilessly. He also tortured the prisoners of war very ruthlessly. He even had private assassins to have anyone killed. He offered Dr Sadao to send two of them to kill the American soldier. He said that they were quite capable and could also remove the dead body of the soldier.

But later he did not do that. In fact there was a selfish motive behind it. He needed Dr Sadao’s services as a doctor. He didn’t want any problem should come to him. Therefore, he left the entire matter on Dr Sadao to solve. He pretended to be a patriot, but in fact he was a very selfish person. He didn’t want him involve himself in the matter. Perhaps, he wanted Dr Sadao to kill the man himself. The General was indeed a very self-absorbed person.

Question 6.
Dr Sadao faced a dilemma. Should he use his ‘ surgical skills to save the life of a wounded American POW or should he hand him over to the Japanese police? How did he resolve the clash of values? (2015 AI)
Answer:
As a doctor, Sadao is taught that he should never let a person die if he could help. One evening he finds a badly injured enemy soldier on the sea beach near his house. The man could die if not given proper medical aid. Now, Dr Sadao uses his surgical skills and perform him an opertation on the man though he is an enemy soldier. He tends him well and took great care of him. In this way, Dr Sadao maintains his professional loyalty and he is able to save the life of the POW with his surgical skills.

But Dr Sadao is a patriotic person also. Therefore he informs everything to the old General. The Gen-eral ensures him to send his private assassins to kill the man. However Dr Sadao has saved that man with great effort. Naturally he does not want any harm should come to that man. Therefore he helps escape the man in a boat in the end of the story.

Question 7.
How did Dr Sadao help then American POW to escape? What humanitarian values do you find in his act?
Answer:
Dr Sadao saved the life of American POW with great effort. Naturally he did not want that any harm should come to him and thus all his efforts be wasted. Therefore he decided to arrange for the escape of that man. Dr Sadao decided to leave his boat on the seashore. He also decided to load the boat with sufficient provisions. The American was dressed in Japanese clothes which Sadao had given him, and at the last moment Sadao wrapped a black cloth about his blond head.

He was told to row the boat to a nearby island, where nobody lived because it remained submerged in the sea most of the year. The doctor displays finer human values in this story. Though his country is in a state of war with America, he does not forget his duty and obligations . as a doctor. He saves the life of the enemy even-at the sake of his life and reputation.

Question 6.
There are moments in life when we have to make hard choices between our roles as private individuals and as citizens with a sense of national loyalty. Discuss with reference to the story you have just read?
Answer:
Every individuals has his or her views. But he/she is expected to follow the rules of society and be loyal to his country. However, sometimes the situation comes when we have to make hard choices between our roles as private individuals and as citizens with a sense of national loyalty. In this situation we must keep national interest at top priority. But some exceptions are always there.

In this story, Dr Sadao meets a badly wounded soldier who is on the verge of death. Now he is taught that he must not let the individual die if he can help. A doctor is not supposed to kill a person even if he happens to be his enemy. But he is a loyal citizen of his country. Though he treats the enemy soldier yet he remains in the state of dilemma. He himself doesn’t know what he is doing.

Question 7.
Dr Sadao was compelled by his duty as a doctor to help the enemy soldier. What made Hana, his wife, sympathetic to him in the face of open defiance from the domestic staff?
Answer:
Dr Sadao has been trained not to let a person die if he could help. The enemy soldier is badly wounded. He is sure to die if he is not given proper medical care. On the other hand, Dr Sadao feels that it is his national duty to hand the enemy over to the authorities. Dr Sadao’s wife, Hana, understands her husband well. She has spent great deal of time with him.

The house staff of Dr Sadao do not like the idea of harbouring the enemy soldier. They bluntly refuse to help their master in tending the enemy soldier. At this juncture, Hana herself washes the enemy soldier and also helps Dr Sadao in giving anaesthetic to the soldier. She feeds the soldier with her own hands. However, she likes her husband wants to get rid of the soldier but she doesn’t know how.

Question 8.
How would you explain the reluctance of the soldier to leave the shelter of doctor’s home even when he knew he couldn’t stay there wit out risk to the doctor and himself?
Answer:
The soldier belonged to the American navy. He was prisoner of the war and somehow he had escaped from the prison. He had a gunshot in his back. It was Dr Sadao who operated on him and saved his life with great effort. He gave the American soldier shelter in his house. It was a big crime and Dr Sadao could be arrested for it. But for Dr Sadao his profession was the first. He was taught that he should not let the person die if he could help it. Dr Sadao did his job with complete honesty.

He saved the prisoner’s life. The American kept on living there. He knew that he would be killed if he left Dr Sadao’s house. He had full confidence in Dr Sadao. He knew that after saving his life Dr Sadao would not let him die. He left it to the doctor to escape from the problem anyway he liked. And indeed, Dr Sadao found a way to save the life of the prisoner.

Question 9.
What explains the attitude of the General in the matter of the enemy soldier? Was it human consideration, lack of national loyalty, dereliction of duty or simple self absorption?
Answer:
Japanese General Takima was a ruthless person. He even had private assassins to kill anybody. He used to torture the prisoners of war very badly. Dr Sadao told him about the American soldier. He assured the doctor that he would send his private assassins to get the soldier killed. But he does not do any such thing. He perhaps leaves it on Dr Sadao to handle the situation any way he likes. The General is worried of himself and he needs Dr Sadao’s services. Therefore he does not want that any harm should come to him.

He does not want anyone know that Dr Sadao has given shelter to an enemy soldier. Therefore he does not send any of his assassins to kill the enemy soldier. It was not in fact human consideration. It was lack of national loyalty and dereliction of duty. The General knowingly does not send any of the assassins. He wants Dr Sadao to deal with the prisoner as he wants.

Question Question10.
While hatred against a member of the enemy race is justifiable, especially during wartime, what makes a human being rise above narrow prejudices?
Answer:
Every human being has love and hatred in their heart. When we think what harm has been caused by the enemy, our heart gets full of hatred for the enemy. But when we find the same enemy badly battered, our hatred diminishes. Then we tend to look at him like a human being who needs our care and sympathy. In this story the same thing happens.

The American soldier belonged to the enemy country. Dr Sadao found him when he was badly wounded. Dr Sadao told himself that he would have handed over that man to the police if he had been fit. But that man had a gunshot on his back. He was badly injured. He could die if he was not given proper medical aid. Dr Sadao had been taught that he would not let the person die if he could help. Therefore. Dr Sadao saved the enemy soldier with great effort.

Question 11.
Do you think the doctor’s final solution to the problem was the best possible one in the circumstances?
Answer:
The doctor had harboured an enemy soldier in his house. All the servants of the house had left their job. It was a grave crime to shelter an enemy soldier. Dr Sadao could be arrested for that. Therefore, Dr Sadao wanted to get rid of that man as soon as possible. He did not want him to handle him over to the police. He knew that they would certainly kill the man. He was in a fix what to do.

Now the man had gained sufficient strength. Dr Sadao adopted the method that could be the best in the given circumstances. He provided the soldier his boat. He also loaded the boat with sufficient provisions. In this way Dr Sadao rose above the narrow considerations and acted in a true humanitarian form. His solution to the problem was the best possible one in the circumstances.

Question 12.
Does the story remind you of ‘Birth’ by A.J. Cronin that you read in Snapshots last year? What are the similarities?
Answer:
Both the stories have one common theme. They both deal with the doctors who have great passion for their profession. In the story ‘Birth’, Dr Andrew Manson brought back life into the still born child with great effort. He knew that for the Morgans that child had great value. It was their first child after twenty years of their marital life.

In this story, Dr Sadao saved the enemy American soldier though it was a great crime to shelter an enemy soldier. He operated on him and gave him proper care and treatment. In the end he helped him to escape by providing his own boat.Thus in both stories it has been shown that for a doctor his true job is to save the life of his patient. He is above the considerations of caste, creed or nationality.